God Is A Shoe
“I’m having a spiritual crisis,” my friend said over the phone.
“I think I must be an atheist because I can’t figure out what “God” is to me. I’ve gone through all the standard descriptions of God and none of them make any sense to me.”
“Maybe your path is not a standard religion,” I said, “perhaps you need to find your own definition. It can be anything you want—who’s to say you’re wrong?”
I’m not sure why, but she was actually surprised by the suggestion. It had never occurred to her that she was free to define God in any which way she fancied.
“OK,” she said, “but that still doesn’t solve my problem because when I think about what God might be, all I get is a feeling—no words to describe it—other than those “New Age” terms that are so cliché that they don’t seem to mean anything anymore.”
It’s a sentiment I’ve heard many times, and one that I share myself: New Age terminology sets off my gag reflex. It all sounds the same and no one is really explaining anything.
The fundamental problem is that we’re stuck with the limited language of our native tongues. We have nothing else to use than the words that appear to be the most descriptive for the message we’re trying to convey. What we need is an upshot of creative verbiage—an infusion of new linguistics. But until then we’re restricted to what’s available in Webster’s.
The ancient teachers used parables, myths and mind-opening riddles rather than attempting the near impossible task of giving a straight description of the indescribable. This all began to change with the advent of New Age, when suddenly everything became “real”: ghosts, angels, parallel lives in alternate universes, you name it, it’s real. But how real is “real?”
In quantum physics there is something called “virtual photons”. These virtual photons are essentially photons that don’t really exist… They are like “real” photons in every respect except for the fact that they are immediately re-absorbed into the electron as soon as they are emitted, rather than flying off on their own as an emission of light.
“Virtual” means “being so in effect or essence, although not in actual fact.” In that same vein, our descriptions of God and our various spiritual experiences are descriptions of a “virtual God” and “virtual experiences of God.”
We are describing the essence of what God is, and how the effect of God can be observed, but we are not describing what God is, as an actual fact. Why? Because God is as invisible, as unfathomable as the particles we’re studying on the subatomic level. And, just as subatomic particles are not made of energy, but rather they are energy, so we are trying with our limited vocabulary to explain that God IS (a force of energy.) Nothing more, nothing less. In fact, there is nothing in the universe other than that which materializes out of pure energy. Which is exactly why we keep hearing the same thing over and over: There is only One God. We are all One. God is within. God is everywhere. So why are so many people having such difficulty “getting” the gist?
In 1996 I had a six-hour long meditative journey into the heart of the ultimate mysteries, (notice I can’t tell you just where the heck I went) during which I was given instantaneous transfers of information on everything from pre-birth decisions and agreements, to explanations and descriptions of that which is referred to as “God.”
When it was over I was elated: I knew why things were the way they were in my life. I understood the synchronicities of how everything worked and flowed together like a path traced through an enormous, chaotic-looking matrix. I knew there were no mistakes; that I was not a victim because even my “enemies” were my allies. I knew what God was!
Imagine the frustration and wrenching dismay when I realized, immediately thereafter, that I had no words, no language of any kind at my disposal to share what I now knew. How could that be?
Because the information was not delivered, nor received, via words and sentences in English (or any other language I speak for that matter.) It was transmitted through images, symbols, motion and sounds that had inherent meaning, even incredible mathematical formulas which I could never decipher in this lifetime, but that I could understand on a sub-intellectual level, like a truth that you can feel in your bones but can’t explain or justify through the use of your mental faculties.
All I was able to put to paper that day was this: “Explain the circular matrix.”
It’s been 10 years, and that’s still as far as I’ve gotten. I do know that one day, someone with a brilliant genius for the language of mathematics will be able to explain God through a mathematical formula. Science and religion will one day join hands and realize that they have been saying the same thing all along.
“Science?” my friend said, “you’re giving me science? Where’s Ami and what have you done to her?”
Yes, dear friend. I’m giving you science. And, no, I’m not saying that science is the answer to the question “what is God?”
I’m saying that science is just another language that can be used when trying to define, explain and describe the One Life Source. Mathematics is a language, just like English, Mongolian or ancient hieroglyphics. If you understand what the symbols (words) represent, then that language can convey meaning.
I am saying that if you want to find out what God is, you can look and find the answer anywhere, and the answer can be communicated and shared in ways that are limited only by your own imagination.
Many insist that only if you believe, if you have faith (theirs, of course), then the power of God will grace you. Or, only if you believe in the voodoo can the curse or blessing affect you. Hogwash! I say.
We do not need to believe in gravity in order for gravity to assert its influence upon our bodies and keep us firmly planted on the face of the earth. The Truth is the truth, whether you believe it or not. Energy interacts with energy on a subatomic level, without cessation, and without regard to whether or not we believe that it is actually taking place.
"God" IS. Whether you “believe in God” or not. The effect of this primary, pure energy that animates all things—the first and only everlasting, continuous building block—is observable everywhere.
God IS. But the word “God/Yahweh/Allah/Shiva” doesn’t have to be the word we use. We can use any word we want that describes the knowing we feel in our bones.
My shoe IS. It is right there on my foot, so therefore it must be “real”. It touches the ground, which IS, underneath my shoe at every step. Metaphorically speaking, my shoes also represent what I wear for protection, with pride, with a feeling of belonging (‘cuz my shoes are so “in” right now) as I walk to work.
So why would I not be able to say “God is a wooden clog.” Can you prove me wrong?
What is the clog made of? Wood. What’s the wood made of? Cells. Cells, which are patterns of molecules that are patterns of atoms, which are patterns of subatomic particles that are made of “nothing.” Nothing, but pure energy.
If there is only One everlasting God…If we are One with everything…If the only “stuff” in the universe is pure energy…And everything is made of this “stuff”…Then God is—virtually, of course—a shoe.
“You’re wacko,” my friend said.
Well, in that case, thank heaven there are no mistakes in the universal petri dish.